When an employer can’t keep you on the payroll after you move abroad, there is one request people reach for again and again: “just make me a contractor.” Sometimes it is exactly the right move and the thing that makes the relocation possible. Sometimes it merely recreates the employment relationship in a way that is expensive for everyone. At Remote Work Europe we see both, and the difference comes down to whether anything real actually changes. Here is how to tell, and how to raise it well.

(General information, not legal or tax advice. Employment status is fact-specific and varies by country; take professional advice before acting. Several specific figures below should be confirmed against current primary sources – see the note to Maya at the end of this draft.)

The short version

Asking to switch from employee to contractor can be what lets you move abroad – but only if the working relationship genuinely changes. Relabelling the same job for the same boss is disguised employment (falso autónomo in Spain, IR35 in the UK), and the law looks at the substance, not the paperwork. It is a poor fit for directors, and the fact that your employer is overseas makes an arrangement harder to enforce against them, not safe for you. Raise it as a solution to their compliance problem, expect a rate conversation, and make the arrangement real.

Why an employer might say yes

The reason your company won’t let you stay an employee abroad is usually permanent establishment risk – the danger that your presence creates a taxable footprint for them in your new country (we cover this in full in why your employer said no to remote work abroad). Engaging you as a genuine contractor can reduce that particular risk, because it is largely a feature of employment. That is why the switch sometimes unlocks a move that “can I just work from there?” could not.

Note the word genuine. It is doing all the work in that sentence.

How to raise it well

If you are going to ask, ask properly:

  • Lead with their problem, not yours. Frame it as a way to keep your contribution without the compliance risk of employing you abroad, rather than a favour you need.
  • Come with the structure worked out – that you will register as self-employed where you are moving, invoice them, and handle your own tax and social security. It signals you understand what you are asking for.
  • Expect a rate conversation, not a salary transfer. Companies often benchmark a contractor rate to local-market rates, not your old salary. Do the rate maths first so you know your real number.
  • Accept that the answer may still be no – some companies won’t engage overseas contractors at all, for reasons that have nothing to do with you.

The trap: substance beats the label

Here is the part that catches people. You cannot simply be “reclassified” as a contractor by changing the paperwork. In almost every country, the law looks at what the relationship actually is, not what the contract calls it. If you do the same job, at the same hours, for the same single manager, with the same equipment and the same exclusivity as before – just with an invoice attached – then in the eyes of the authorities you may still be an employee.

The warning signs are consistent everywhere:

  • You work set hours and can’t really choose when or where
  • You have one client – your former employer – and no others
  • You are managed day to day, on the org chart, using company systems and email
  • You can’t send someone else to do the work in your place
  • You carry no real business risk: a fixed monthly amount, no exposure to profit or loss

None of these alone is decisive, and having one doesn’t sink you. But a cluster of them describes employment, whatever the contract says.

This has a different name almost everywhere, but it is the same doctrine. In Spain it is falso autónomo; in the UK, IR35; in Germany, Scheinselbständigkeit (the most actively enforced version in Europe); in France, salariat déguisé; and the Netherlands, Italy and Belgium each have their own. The labels change; the questions they ask – control, dependence, exclusivity, whose business it really is – barely do. Registering and sending invoices does not settle it anywhere; the substance does. Our map of IR35 equivalents across Europe walks through each country if you want the detail for yours.

However you register – as an autónomo in Spain, a sole trader in the UK, a micro-entrepreneur in France, a ZZP’er in the Netherlands, or through an Estonian company – the classification test sits on top of it, unchanged.

Does it matter if the employer is overseas?

This is the question people most want a comfortable answer to, and it deserves an honest one. Say you have moved to Spain and you are invoicing a company with no presence there – the test for false self-employment is exactly the same as if you were invoicing a local firm, and the same holds in Germany, France or wherever else you land. What changes is enforcement, not the rule. A company with no office, staff or assets in your country is harder for the authorities to investigate and collect from – but “harder to catch” is not the same as “allowed.” There is a second layer, too: the company can be exposed under its own country’s rules regardless of where you sit, so neither side is automatically safe.

And crucially, you are still there. You are physically and fiscally present in your new country, which makes you far easier to regulate than a distant employer. You carry your own local obligations – registration, tax, VAT where it applies, social security – regardless of where the client sits. So treat the overseas angle as a reason the company may face less practical exposure, never as cover that makes a disguised-employment arrangement safe for you.

When it’s genuinely the wrong move

Some situations carry enough extra risk that the honest answer is “get advice first, and probably don’t.”

  • Company directors, non-executive directors and senior decision-makers. Going freelance usually will not remove the permanent-establishment risk here – for a director it comes from where the company is run and where its contracts are signed, not from your employment label, so swapping a salary for invoices changes little. In the UK a director is also an office-holder, so directors’ fees stay taxed as employment (PAYE) whatever else you set up; you cannot route the office through a personal company to escape it. Directors usually need different routes entirely – keeping decision-making and board meetings in the home country, or a properly-substanced local limited company – none of it a magic fix, and all of it a conversation for a cross-border tax adviser rather than a contractor agreement.
  • Anyone whose relationship won’t actually change. If the plan is “same job, same boss, same everything, now as a contractor,” the plan is the trap.
  • Roles where you’d be the employer’s only substantive activity in the country – that can pull the permanent-establishment risk you were trying to avoid straight back in.

Who carries the risk

Reassuringly for the worker, the larger retrospective bill usually falls on the engager if an arrangement is reclassified – back social-security contributions, unpaid payroll taxes, penalties and interest, because those should have run through payroll. But you are not risk-free: while you operate as a contractor you must genuinely register and pay your own local taxes and contributions, and you can’t safely just stop filing on the theory that your client “should” be treating you as an employee. Reclassification is a formal process, not a default you can assume.

How to make it genuinely freelance

If the switch is right, make it real rather than cosmetic:

  • Work towards more than one client where you can – it is the single strongest signal of genuine self-employment, and the best protection against a single client drying up.
  • Take control of how and when you work, rather than slotting into the old rota.
  • Use your own tools and systems.
  • Price and invoice like a business – per project or a proper day rate, not a salary in disguise.

Do those things and you are not gaming a label; you are actually running a business, which is the point of going freelance in the first place.

Frequently asked questions

Can my employer just switch me from employee to contractor so I can move abroad? They can agree to engage you as a contractor, but they cannot simply relabel you. For it to hold, the relationship has to genuinely change – you invoicing as a self-employed business, with real independence – rather than the same job with a new title. And they may decline entirely; some companies won’t take on overseas contractors at all.

Is it legal to be a contractor for only one company – my former employer? It is allowed, but it is a warning sign, not a safe position. A single client who used to be your employer, with the same work and conditions, looks a lot like disguised employment. Other clients, control over how you work, and your own business risk are what make it genuine. In Spain, earning most of your income from one client also brings you into specific “economically dependent” rules.

What is falso autónomo? It is Spanish for false (bogus) self-employment: someone registered and invoicing as an autónomo whose real working relationship meets the test for employment. Registering and sending invoices does not prevent it – the authorities look at dependence, control and whose business it really is. If a relationship is reclassified, the engager typically faces back social-security contributions and penalties.

Does IR35 apply if I move abroad? IR35 is the UK’s version of the same substance-over-label test, and exactly how it applies once you are tax-resident elsewhere is complex and fact-specific – another reason to take advice. The broader point holds wherever you go: nearly every country asks whether a “contractor” is really an employee in disguise, and decides on the facts.

If my employer is overseas, can Spain really act on false self-employment? The test is the same regardless of where the client sits; what changes is enforcement. A company with no presence or assets in Spain is harder for the authorities to pursue – but that is enforcement difficulty, not permission. You, meanwhile, are physically and fiscally in Spain and fully subject to its rules, so treat the overseas angle as the company’s lower practical exposure, never as safety for you.

Where to go next